space-tart replied to your post: I decided to read an article to see what this…

/sigh/ Don’t we all already use ad-blocker tho?

yeah but it’s the principle of the thing

I decided to read an article to see what this whole Yahoo buyout was about when all of a sudden

lol nevermind i’m out, i’ll see you fucktrucks later

applying for jobs makes me feel all growed up

confusedtree:

Hahahahahaha

Aaaaaaahahahahahaha

HAHAHAHAHAHA

HAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I’LL SEE YOU FRICKERS IN HECK

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA

I come back to tumblr and I have over 700 followers. Cool, welcome everyone, thanks for following!

well I mean at least they didn’t name the Doctor

so that’s good

we-are-star-stuff:

leftybegone:

“While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.” So proclaimed God in the Book of Genesis, but what does He know? He hasn’t got anything on Gaia.

Of course you can’t use biblical arguments when trying to persuade those of a different theological bent. A non-Christian will not listen when his opponent begins the debate with “The Bible says,” just as a Christian will not listen when his opponent begins the debate with “The Hadith say.” And that’s fine.

But using Bible-based arguments when debating with those who both subscribe to the alarmism of modern-day environmentalism and profess Christianity is a valid tactic. Pay attention, Gaians:

The Bible does say we should not be cruel to animals and that humans are to take care of the Earth, but not to such an idolatrous extent that you environmentalists would like us to. The earth is not God and must never be the object of our love.

As I mentioned at the top, the Bible also says that the seasons will always exist and that heat and cold will always be a part of them. There will be decades-long cycles during which the average temperatures around the world are slightly warmer than previously, and there will be decades-long cycles during which those temperatures are slightly cooler than previously. But this see-sawing of warmth and coldness will always exist; there will never be a time in which, say, the 20-degree winters of Virginia are exchanged for 70-degree winters. If you believe in the Bible, you must believe in good environmental stewardship, yes, but you must not believe in any sort of permanent global warming. 

To those liberal “Christians” who pick and choose which parts of the Bible to believe—that Paul hated both women and homosexuals and therefore his writings are not to be considered valid, for instance—you’re fools. Where did you hear about Christianity in the first place? Ultimately, from the Bible, of course. If Jesus were not mentioned in the Bible, you would have no basis for following His teachings. You follow His teachings because they’re in the Bible. So too you must accept all the other words of the Bible, and that includes those of the eighth chapter and twenty-second verse of Genesis at the top of this piece.

And finally, to those atheist environmentalists, I say this: You are not atheists; your religion is Ecology, your god, Earth. Carbon credits are no different from the Catholic Church’s selling of indulgences in the Middle Ages. “You may sin [against Gaia] if you pay us [the Government, the Prophet of Ecology].” Those “My other car is a hybrid” bumper stickers are receipts for the indulgence of owning a sinful, non-hybrid vehicle. Your fellow Ecologists may admire you for owning a hybrid that you own simply for the pride it gives you, and for the alleviation of your guilt, but to the rest of us, that bumper sticker might as well read, “I’ve been had.” 

“And finally, to those atheist environmentalists, I say this: You are not atheists; your religion is Ecology, your god, Earth. Carbon credits are no different from the Catholic Church’s selling of indulgences in the Middle Ages.”

headlikeahole replied to your post: if you think the new daft punk album was good, try…

and if not? listened to it once and thought it was quite crappy. gonna give it at least 2 more trys anyway :)

it’s really good if you go into it without any preconceptions of how its going to sound or should sound, and if you just let it take you where its going to take you, I remember the first time I listened to it I was kind of like “Meh, this isn’t that great” but that’s only because I was expecting it to sound a certain way and it was different than what I expected, but the next couple listen-throughs I kind of approached it with more of an open mind and I actually really enjoyed it. Then I listened to it while tripping balls and that was a completely different thing in and of itself, like you literally become the music, and it takes you on like a journey, and it is easily one of the best things I have ever experienced, but it’s really hard to explain.